Causal effect of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D concentration on cardioembolic stroke: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The putative association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration [25(OH)D] and the risk of cardioembolic stroke (CES) has been examined in observational studies, which indicate controversial findings. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the causal relationship of serum 25(OH)D with the risk of CES. METHODS AND RESULTS: The summary statistics dataset on the genetic variants related to 25(OH)D was used from the published GWAS of European descent participants in the UK Biobank, including 417,580 subjects, yielding 143 independent loci in 112 1-Mb regions. GWAS summary data of CES was obtained from GIGASTROKE Consortium, which included European individuals (10,804 cases, 1,234,808 controls). Our results unveiled a causal relationship between 25(OH)D and CES using IVW [OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.67-0.98, p = 0.037]. Horizontal pleiotropy was not seen [MR-Egger intercept = 0.001; p = 0.792], suggesting an absence of horizontal pleiotropy. Cochrane's Q [Q = 78.71, p-value = 0.924], Rucker's Q [Q = 78.64, p-value = 0.913], and I2 = 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0%, 24.6%) statistic suggested no heterogeneity. This result remained consistent using different MR methods and sensitivity analyses, including Maximum likelihood [OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.67-0.98, p-value = 0.036], Constrained maximum likelihood [OR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.64-0.90, p-value = 0.002], Debiased inverse-variance weighted [OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.68-0.99, p-value = 0.002], MR-PRESSO [OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.77-0.87, p-value = 0.022], RAPS [OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.67-0.98, p-value = 0.038], MR-Lasso [OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.68-0.99, p-value = 0.037]. CONCLUSION: Our MR analysis provides suggestive evidence that increased 25(OH)D levels may play a protective role in the development of cardioembolic stroke. Determining the role of 25(OH)D in stroke subtypes has important clinical and public health implications.

Revisional Bariatric Surgery due to Complications: Indications and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of bariatric procedures has led to a surge in revisional surgeries. Failure of bariatric surgery can be attributed to inadequate weight loss or complications necessitating revisional surgery. In this study, we investigated the indications and outcomes of revisional surgery due to complications following primary bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study, which included patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery between March 2013 and September 2021 due to complications following primary bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Of the 5382 patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), 203 (3.70%) required revisional surgery, with 37 cases performed due to surgical complications. The indications of revisional operations were gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (n=17, 45.9%), protein-calorie malnutrition (PCM) (n=14, 37.8%), unexplained abdominal pain (n=5, 13.5%), and phytobezoar (n=1, 0.03%). In the postoperative follow-up, most patients exhibited improvement in signs and symptoms related to underlying causes. However, eight patients experienced early or late complications of grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with one death resulting from liver failure. CONCLUSION: Revisional bariatric surgery may effectively address complications from primary bariatric surgery, with the majority of patients experiencing improvements in symptoms. While the overall incidence of revisional surgery due to complications is relatively low, our findings suggest that GERD and PCM are the most common indications for revisional surgery.

The Association between COVID-19 and Reactive Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a joint inflammation that follows an infection at a distant site, often in the gastrointestinal or urogenital tract. Since the emergence of COVID-19 in January 2020, several case reports have suggested a relation between reactive arthritis and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), due to the novelty of the disease, most findings were reported in the form of case reports or case series, and a comprehensive overview is still lacking. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline and Embase to identify studies addressing the association between ReA and COVID-19. The following terms were used: ("Reactive Arthritis" OR "Post-Infectious Arthritis" OR "Post Infectious Arthritis") AND ("COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV"). RESULTS: A total number of 35 reports published up to February 16th, 2022, were included in this study. A wide range of ages was affected (mean 41.0, min 4 max 78), with a higher prevalence of males (61.0%) from 16 countries. The number and location of the affected joints were different in included patients, with a higher prevalence of polyarthritis in 41.5% of all cases. Cutaneous manifestations and visual impairments were found as the most common associated symptoms. Most patients (95.1%) recovered, with a mean recovery time of 24 days. Moreover, arthritis induced by COVID-19 seems to relieve faster than ReA, followed by other infections. CONCLUSION: ReA can be a possible sequel of COVID-19 infection. Since musculoskeletal pain is a frequent symptom of COVID-19, ReA with rapid onset can easily be misdiagnosed. Therefore, clinicians should consider ReA a vital differential diagnosis in patients with post-COVID-19 joint swelling. Additional studies are required for further analysis and to corroborate these findings.